BEMPU Health
TempWatchPeer-Reviewed PublicationRandomised Controlled Trial

TempWatch for Monitoring Hypothermia in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Year

2020

Location

🇮🇳 Hyderabad, India

Sample Size

100 VLBW infants (RCT)

Investigators

Pranitha Reddy Muppidi, Srinivas Murki, Sai Kiran, Tejo Pratap Oleti, Venkat Reddy Kallem, Bhargavi Kamineni, Venkateshwarlu Vardhelli, Deepak Sharma

Institutions

Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana

Published In

Perinatology

Background & Methods

A randomized controlled trial at Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, to evaluate the efficacy of BEMPU TempWatch for detecting hypothermia in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, < 1.5 kg) infants in the NICU. 100 VLBW infants were randomized to TempWatch (n=50) or conventional monitoring (n=50). The primary outcome was number of hypothermia episodes detected; secondary outcomes included weight gain.

Key Results

Outcome / MetricBEMPU GroupControl Groupp-value
Hypothermia episodes detected (mean ± SD)11 ± 80.42 ± 1.2<0.001
  • 1The TempWatch group detected significantly more hypothermia episodes — a mean of 11±8 versus 0.42±1.2 in the conventional monitoring group (p<0.001).
  • 2This striking difference reflects the value of continuous versus intermittent monitoring: most episodes were missed entirely by standard care.
  • 3No significant difference in weight gain was observed between groups, possibly because both groups were in a high-monitoring NICU environment.

Why This Matters

This RCT provides perhaps the most compelling demonstration of TempWatch's core value proposition: continuous monitoring detects hypothermia episodes that intermittent monitoring misses. A 26-fold increase in detected events (11 vs 0.42) quantifies the scale of under-detection in standard NICU care.

How to Cite

Muppidi PR, Murki S, Kiran S, et al. TempWatch for monitoring hypothermia in very-low-birth-weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Perinatology. 2020;20(4).